Public intelligence for pharmaceutical teams

A therapy can be understood clinically and still be misunderstood publicly.

Patients discuss access and experience. Advocates challenge evidence. Trial news moves through media and markets. Socialhose gives communications, insights, and medical-affairs teams a live view of monitored public conversation, with the source context needed to route what warrants review.

Socialhose pharmaceutical intelligence workspace
Trusted by

Pharmaceutical listening facts

7

Public social platforms

Track the public conversation your Live Searches define across X, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, LinkedIn, Snapchat, and Reddit.

12

Language filters

Separate supported multilingual conversation for review by teams with the relevant language and market context.

Source-linked

Mentions retain context

Move from a trend back to the captured content, author, time, engagement, media, and enrichment behind it.

The conversation around the medicine

Public narrative does not respect the org chart.

Follow the connected questions that move between patients, advocates, clinicians, media, investors, and the wider public without pretending one signal answers every regulated function.

What are patients and caregivers saying about access and experience?

Track public language around affordability, availability, dosing experience, adherence barriers, support programs, and care navigation. Treat each post as a signal for authorized review, not as validated medical evidence.

How is the therapy narrative changing?

Compare the intended message with the themes, entities, claims, sentiment, and emotion that gain traction in monitored conversation. See where understanding fragments by platform, language, or market.

Which trial or evidence discussion warrants review?

Follow study names, molecules, indications, endpoints, conferences, investigators, and known issue terms. Alerts can surface a monitored shift; medical, legal, safety, and communications teams decide its significance and response.

Where are access, trust, and market narratives converging?

Connect public discussion of price, supply, policy, evidence, competitors, and corporate reputation. Keep the source material visible when the same issue reaches different stakeholders with different stakes.

From signal to cross-functional context

A watch floor built for human review

Socialhose structures and distributes public-conversation evidence. It does not replace pharmacovigilance, medical review, or regulated case-processing systems.

Therapy and entity context

Extract brands, products, people, organizations, locations, topics, and key points from each captured Mention.

Sentiment, emotion, and intent

Use structured enrichment to distinguish questions, complaints, praise, information, and promotion while retaining the source text for review.

Relevance and noise controls

Reduce spam, duplicates, and keyword coincidence before routing a monitored signal to a specialist team.

Alerts and executive summaries

Distribute source-linked alerts, digests, themes, sentiment context, and recommended review actions at the cadence the workflow requires.

Cross-functional distribution

Use mailing lists and stakeholder digests to give communications, insights, medical, safety, and leadership the appropriate view of the same public evidence.

Exports, webhooks, and API

Export CSV, JSON, Excel, or PDF, or use plan-gated webhooks and scoped API access to connect approved downstream workflows.

We publish what the platform can reveal

A public-health conversation can be measured without flattening the people inside it

The Texas Healthcare Conversation Report (Edition 02) analyzed 13 weeks of public posts and measured the Voice Gap between institutional healthcare messaging and patient experience. It is proof of method, not a fabricated pharma customer story.

1,564 Public posts analyzed

A dated corpus covering Texas healthcare conversation from April through June 2026.

47.6 pts The Voice Gap

Institutional posts ran 78% positive while patient posts ran 53% negative.

16% Conversation in Spanish

A distinct access conversation centered on appointments, vaccines, and care navigation.

Published by Social Knowing, our independent research journal. Report figures derive from the Socialhose Public API and are frozen at publication; the live monitor carries the current reading.

Questions pharmaceutical teams ask first

Questions pharmaceutical teams ask first

Does Socialhose replace pharmacovigilance or case processing?
No. Socialhose can surface and enrich monitored public Mentions for review. Your authorized safety and medical teams remain responsible for validation, reportability decisions, follow-up, timelines, privacy, and every regulated workflow.
Which public platforms can we monitor?
Live collection supports X, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Reddit. Available public content and query syntax vary by platform and the Live Search you configure.
Does the platform monitor private patient communities?
No. Socialhose monitors public social conversation. It does not access private groups, direct messages, patient records, or closed communities.
Can the AI determine whether a claim or event is medically valid?
No. AI enrichment can organize sentiment, emotion, intent, entities, products, topics, and relevance. Qualified people must review the source and decide medical validity, significance, and response.
How much historical context is available?
Historical availability and lookback vary by platform and Live Search type. Socialhose leads with live collection and provides historical context where the selected source supports it.
Can different functions work from the same evidence?
Yes. Campaigns, alerts, digests, statuses, exports, mailing lists, and plan-gated API access can support separate review and distribution paths. Each team keeps responsibility for its own authorized process.
Is there an annual contract?
No. Socialhose plans are month-to-month with published pricing, no setup fee, and no minimum term.

Put public context beside the decision

Bring the public conversation into the room before the next decision.

Give communications, medical affairs, patient engagement, and investor relations a shared view of the public signals shaping a medicine's narrative.