Public social platforms
Track the public conversation your Live Searches define across X, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, LinkedIn, Snapchat, and Reddit.
Public intelligence for pharmaceutical teams
Patients discuss access and experience. Advocates challenge evidence. Trial news moves through media and markets. Socialhose gives communications, insights, and medical-affairs teams a live view of monitored public conversation, with the source context needed to route what warrants review.
Track the public conversation your Live Searches define across X, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, LinkedIn, Snapchat, and Reddit.
Separate supported multilingual conversation for review by teams with the relevant language and market context.
Move from a trend back to the captured content, author, time, engagement, media, and enrichment behind it.
The conversation around the medicine
Follow the connected questions that move between patients, advocates, clinicians, media, investors, and the wider public without pretending one signal answers every regulated function.
Track public language around affordability, availability, dosing experience, adherence barriers, support programs, and care navigation. Treat each post as a signal for authorized review, not as validated medical evidence.
Compare the intended message with the themes, entities, claims, sentiment, and emotion that gain traction in monitored conversation. See where understanding fragments by platform, language, or market.
Follow study names, molecules, indications, endpoints, conferences, investigators, and known issue terms. Alerts can surface a monitored shift; medical, legal, safety, and communications teams decide its significance and response.
Connect public discussion of price, supply, policy, evidence, competitors, and corporate reputation. Keep the source material visible when the same issue reaches different stakeholders with different stakes.
From signal to cross-functional context
Socialhose structures and distributes public-conversation evidence. It does not replace pharmacovigilance, medical review, or regulated case-processing systems.
Extract brands, products, people, organizations, locations, topics, and key points from each captured Mention.
Use structured enrichment to distinguish questions, complaints, praise, information, and promotion while retaining the source text for review.
Reduce spam, duplicates, and keyword coincidence before routing a monitored signal to a specialist team.
Distribute source-linked alerts, digests, themes, sentiment context, and recommended review actions at the cadence the workflow requires.
Use mailing lists and stakeholder digests to give communications, insights, medical, safety, and leadership the appropriate view of the same public evidence.
Export CSV, JSON, Excel, or PDF, or use plan-gated webhooks and scoped API access to connect approved downstream workflows.
We publish what the platform can reveal
The Texas Healthcare Conversation Report (Edition 02) analyzed 13 weeks of public posts and measured the Voice Gap between institutional healthcare messaging and patient experience. It is proof of method, not a fabricated pharma customer story.
A dated corpus covering Texas healthcare conversation from April through June 2026.
Institutional posts ran 78% positive while patient posts ran 53% negative.
A distinct access conversation centered on appointments, vaccines, and care navigation.
Published by Social Knowing, our independent research journal. Report figures derive from the Socialhose Public API and are frozen at publication; the live monitor carries the current reading.
Questions pharmaceutical teams ask first
Put public context beside the decision
Give communications, medical affairs, patient engagement, and investor relations a shared view of the public signals shaping a medicine's narrative.